At a 92% confidence level, it suggests the possibility of different authors. In other words, when it is judged that the message authors from 2016 and 2018 are not the same person, the likelihood of the conclusion being wrong is 8%. Therefore, at a 92% confidence level, it can be interpreted that the messages were not written by the same person.
—-
He’s claiming the texts from 2016-2018 were from someone else
original post: here
1. A Katalk tester ㄷㄷ
2. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
3. From now on, everyone should speak in the same way as they did two years ago.
> Freaking funny
> ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
4. Please ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ Seriously who do they hire in this company? Nobody around him is telling him to stop?
5. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ Ah seriously ㅠㅠㅠ ㅋㅋㅋㅋ Even chodings can’t come up with these types of lame excuses
6. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ What kind of ‘scientific analysis’ would analyze the way of writing? ㅋㅋㅋ Who even use the same way of writing from 2 years ago? ㅋ
7. He’s not making them analyze his handwriting, what “likelihood”….
8. Not handwriting but Katalks? ㅋㅋㅋ
9. What kind of comedy is that?
10. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.