![[instiz] ADOR “RESTRICTIONS ON NEWJEANS’ ACTIVITIES? NO, POSITION “TOGETHER WITH ADOR””](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhk0omN_QuLgCp0v7XwDgfnCVPvD7xN6VktTsL1om0k8vR2VB4uYgIR_jRCqzeJQEIQfwvfZ1SzpmaREgg0NTWlRpB-E2-E7Rfu2pCFtXGcjcYl7Nlr5zmZfZuWowGxB5tRNFv1o1lMnMCrrU8DeD1lrj05brd9spFWi3yane8hOV9ImH3LexBzD-tuobPY=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu "[instiz] ADOR “RESTRICTIONS ON NEWJEANS’ ACTIVITIES? NO, POSITION “TOGETHER WITH ADOR””")
ADOR is in the process of expanding their injunction for ‘preserving the status of the agency and prohibiting the signing of advertising contracts,’ and as NewJeans has expanded their activities with the release of new songs and the announcement of large overseas performances, ADOR has reluctantly expanded the purpose of the injunction request.
This is not intended to restrict their activities but rather to propose that they continue their entertainment activities ‘together with ADOR’ and ‘while honoring the contract.’
As already publicly stated, ADOR has never applied pressure to the event organizers, nor has the expansion of the injunction request been made as a retaliatory measure. ADOR will clarify any misunderstandings regarding the artist in court tomorrow and seek a judgment that ADOR is the agency of New Jeans, which many of the former members have been waiting for.
1. I’m telling you the contract already ended;
2. Isn’t the injunction tomorrow…? Just how low are they going to go?
3. This was funny
4. Stop this joke already
5. Do they really think the public are fools?
6. But that’s straight up retaliation
7. They completed the contract no…? Why are they like that?
8. What “together”? … Just part ways already
9. Screw off
10. This was so unsincere
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.