![[instiz] PART FROM DANIELLE’S TRIAL TODAY THAT SEEMED TOO CRUEL](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEif2YmczPj4O7K2DFAhd72DS4A0iq8PaNJa-xj9Y_5Rp_S6MsgXfsMIuOc1IVl5126B7yPWPa7F7w4nys0beB_FmM8CIXnAaSKmu4Xb7FW_sjUdoM1ZPrnMYXDeVBrDOdHjqjUny6tUl2ycoa4ntP8YXRtK0QeSzdySAYjH8zs6i8S-p7poFMyyU8s74yzs=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu "[instiz] PART FROM DANIELLE’S TRIAL TODAY THAT SEEMED TOO CRUEL")
“Transcript of the trial:
We would like to state our position regarding the plaintiff’s litigation tactics: four months after the issue regarding the plaintiff’s whereabouts arose, the plaintiff dismissed all legal representatives and appointed new ones, arguing that the case should start anew from this point forward. From the very beginning, we have stated that the plaintiff targeted only Danielle among the NewJeans members to issue a notice of termination and proceed with the lawsuit, and that this was intended as a warning to the other members as well. We have explained that by prolonging the litigation, the plaintiff is wasting the most crucial period of the idols’ careers on legal proceedings, thereby achieving their objective.”
A trial is currently underway to intimidate the members of NewJeans, and they’re just trying to drag it out without presenting a single piece of evidence.
1. This was the recorded trial right?
> Yes
2. It says “Defendant’s argument” right there
3. Wait, seriously, why aren’t they submitting any evidence? It feels like they’re just stalling, which makes it seem like the defendant’s argument is actually valid.
4. But isn’t stalling a tactic often used by the side that has nothing to lose in a lawsuit? We’ll only find out much later whether they really don’t have any evidence or if they’re just withholding it on purpose to drag things out
5. If it seems like it’s just Danielle’s side making these claims, I’d rather trust her than a company that can’t produce a single piece of evidence
6. There are some people who pretend to be neutral in the comments but clearly have malicious intent. Good job moderating the comments
7. Wow, so many haters hereㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ They won the lawsuit and came back, only to find them suddenly changing their tune and defending the company that was playing politics
8. I really wish Danielle success
9. But isn’t this true? HYVE can’t produce a single piece of evidence, yet they’re singling out just one person, that’s their real motive
10. Isn’t it a fact that, given the current situation, the defendant’s claim is more credible than that of a company with no evidence?