[theqoo] KIM SOOHYUN, HAD HIS REASONS TO CONTINUE SHOOTING ‘GOOD DAY’ DESPITE RUMORS OF RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MINOR KIM SAERON

Actor Kim Soohyun was embroiled in allegations that he had been in a relationship with the late Kim Saeron since she was a minor, yet he still proceeded with filming Good Day. Kim Soohyun’s side claims they had evidence to argue that these allegations were not true.

Kim Soohyun has recently faced accusations from the YouTube channel Garosero Research Institute and the late Kim Saeron’s family members, claiming that they had been in a romantic relationship since Kim Saeron was in her third year of middle school, at the age of 15, for a period of six years. However, his agency, Gold Medalist, denied these allegations, calling them “defamation based on false facts.”

[…]

According to the agency, Kim Soohyun and Kim Saeron were in a relationship from the summer of 2019, when Kim Saeron became an adult, until the fall of 2020. The photo that Garosero claimed was taken when Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron were in middle school, showing them kissing, was actually taken in early 2020, during their winter relationship. The clothes Kim Saeron wore in the photo were from a brand that debuted the item in June 2019, making it impossible for the photo to have been taken when Kim Saeron was a minor, as Garosero suggested.

Gold Medalist also clarified the situation regarding Kim Saeron’s claim to Kim Soohyun on March 19th of last year, where she allegedly asked him to “save me” and complained about a 700 million wpn damage claim. The penalty resulting from Kim Saeron’s drunk driving incident was about 1.114 billion won. Gold Medalist worked to reduce the compensation amount to 700 million won through their efforts, but when Kim Saeron found herself in a situation where it was difficult to repay the remaining amount, Gold Medalist processed her debt as a loss in December 2023.

However, in this process, Gold Medalist had to follow legal procedures, including audits, to ensure that there was no breach of trust by their executives. As such, they were not supposed to send any collection notices to Kim Saeron. Furthermore, there was concern that Kim Saeron would have to pay gift tax due to the debt forgiveness. To prove that the situation was “unrecoverable,” Kim Saeron sent a content verification letter, and Gold Medalist followed the process to handle the loss.

[…]

Most importantly, Gold Medalist strongly refuted Garosero’s claims, stating, “The photo that was taken as an adult was changed into one that was claimed to be taken at 16. A close acquaintance of the late Kim Saeron’s mother was said to be her aunt. After a strong visual claim was made to attract attention, the content and timeline of that evidence were cleverly altered. As a result, an image of a single text message was captured, and the debt issue, which was carefully managed by her previous agency, was falsely portrayed as an attempt to pressure her to repay money. This led to the misrepresentation that the debt issue that was settled by the company a year ago directly caused the tragic passing of the late Kim Saeron.”

In this way, Kim Soohyun’s side specifically countered the allegations raised by Garosero. From Kim Soohyun’s perspective, as the claims made by Garoserowere baseless and there was evidence to support this, he likely judged that there was no reason to refrain from filming Good Day due to the controversy, which is why he chose to participate in the filming.

source: https://naver.me/xdpTQBhl

original post: here

1. How on earth are these journalists now bashing the mother?

2. He’s poisonous 

3. Impressive

4. So they’re just going to write articles with blatant mistakes in them to make it seem like it’s resolved? They said they were in a relationship from the summer of 2019 to the fall of 2020, but the kissing photo was taken in early 2020, during their winter relationship, capturing a private moment ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ Start by fixing your dates

5. They keep insisting on this rhetoric, and the media just shields them. Will they shut up only if the late person’s diary is made public? Or will they claim it’s manipulated then?

6. Didn’t they say the photo was from 2016, and that the deceased was in a relationship from this time to that time? Why are they making it seem like it was just something the mother’s acquaintance said? When the aunt reported it, the mother was right there too

7. Just how much money did they pay for these articles?

8. 🤮🤮🤮

9. Why do I feel like the media and this guy are one and the same?

10. So they’re gonna insist on shoving him in that drama and variety show?